Before ordering faucets for a particular market or project, establish which documents the responsible importer, specification owner or compliance reviewer requires. Then connect each document to the proposed product. This checklist helps organise that review without treating a certificate image or an old news article as a complete approval package.
Start with the destination and intended product
Record the destination, intended installation, model and ordered configuration. Ask the party responsible for the project requirements to identify the applicable specifications and document expectations. Keep their current requirements with the enquiry so that the supplier can respond to a defined request.
If a requirement is unresolved, mark it as an open item. Avoid replacing it with a general statement such as “all certificates required” or copying a list from a different product or market. The supplier and reviewer need to know exactly what is being checked.
Create a document register for the order
| Register field | What to check |
|---|---|
| Document type | Identify whether the file is a product listing, test report, declaration or company-level certificate |
| Issuer and identifier | Record the issuing organisation and the complete reference number |
| Product scope | Match model names, listed configurations and covered components to the enquiry |
| Referenced requirements | Compare the document references with the project’s specified requirements |
| Status and dates | Record the status checked, the date of review and any stated validity limits |
| Verification source | Keep the relevant issuer listing or confirmation alongside the supplied file |
| Open questions | Assign an owner and obtain a documented resolution before approval |
Verify the relationship between the document and the SKU
Compare the model in the quotation with the model or range described in the document. If the order uses a private-label identifier, ask the supplier to explain its relationship to the listed product. Keep that explanation with the review rather than relying on similar photographs or model names.
Read the scope and limitations supplied with the document. Where an issuer provides a searchable listing, use the issuer’s own reference and record what was checked. If the relationship between a listing and the proposed configuration is unclear, ask the issuer or the responsible reviewer to resolve it.
Keep different kinds of evidence separate
A company-level document, a product listing and a test report answer different review questions. File them separately and identify the requirement each is intended to support. Request missing product-level information explicitly instead of assuming it is covered by a general company document.
Avoid turning historic announcement dates into current purchasing instructions. Standards, listings and project requirements should be checked at the time of review. Record the source used and the person responsible for the final approval.
Review changes before accepting a revised configuration
If the model, components, materials or other specified details change, tell the reviewer what changed and ask whether the previous evidence still applies. Keep the original and revised configuration references so a later inspection can identify which version was approved.
Retain the final document register with the purchase order, approved product specification and receiving records. This provides a traceable answer when the distributor, installer or project owner asks what was reviewed for that supply.
Requesting documents from VIGA
Use VIGA’s certifications page as a starting point, then send the selected model, destination and required document list through Contact Us. Ask for confirmation of the scope relevant to the proposed order before approving it.
Editorial review: September 17, 2026.

WeChat
Scan the QR Code with WeChat